Honda Fit vs Mazda Axela
The Fit costs less to run, by the official figures: about £70 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £580 (better)
- £650
- New Zealand
- $954 (better)
- $1,070
- Australia
- $790 (better)
- $887
- United States
- $737 (better)
- $827
Official figures
- Uses
- 96 mpg (better)
- 85 mpg
- Also
- 3.0 L/100km (better)
- 3.3 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 843 miles
- 957 miles (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 470 L (better)
- 392 L
- Length
- 4,044 mm
- 4,460 mm
- Weight
- 1,228 kg
- 1,350 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 95 kW
- 114 kW (better)
- Torque
- 153 Nm
- 200 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- CVT
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Airbags
- 6
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Fit or Axela?
Which is cheaper to run, the Honda Fit or the Mazda Axela?
The Honda Fit: about £70 a year less in the UK than the Mazda Axela at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Honda Fit or the Mazda Axela?
The Honda Fit, at 3.0 L/100km (96 mpg UK, 80 mpg US) to the Mazda Axela's 3.3 L/100km (85 mpg UK, 71 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Which has the bigger boot, the Honda Fit or the Mazda Axela?
The Honda Fit, at 470 L to the Mazda Axela's 392 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
