Bentley Mulsanne vs Rolls-Royce Phantom
The Mulsanne costs less to run, by the official figures: about $410 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $3,783 (better)
- $4,197
- New Zealand
- $4,896 (better)
- $5,433
- Australia
- $4,059 (better)
- $4,502
- United Kingdom
- £2,975 (better)
- £3,301
Official figures
- Uses
- 16 mpg (better)
- 14 mpg
- Also
- 15.1 L/100km (better)
- 16.8 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 328 miles
- 333 miles (better)
Space
- Seats
- 4
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 548 L
- Length
- 5,575 mm
- 5,762 mm
- Weight
- 2,585 kg
- 2,560 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 6.75 L V8 twin-turbo petrol
- 6.75 L V12 twin-turbo petrol
- Power
- 377 kW
- 420 kW (better)
- Torque
- 1,020 Nm (better)
- 900 Nm
- Gearbox
- 8-speed automatic
- 8-speed automatic
- Drive
- RWD
- RWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Mulsanne or Phantom?
Which is cheaper to run, the Bentley Mulsanne or the Rolls-Royce Phantom?
The Bentley Mulsanne: about $410 a year less in the US than the Rolls-Royce Phantom at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Bentley Mulsanne or the Rolls-Royce Phantom?
The Bentley Mulsanne, at 15.1 L/100km (19 mpg UK, 16 mpg US) to the Rolls-Royce Phantom's 16.8 L/100km (17 mpg UK, 14 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
