Ford Everest vs Nissan Kicks

The Kicks costs less to run, by the official figures: about $830 a year less in the US.

Ford EverestNissan Kicks

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Ford EverestNissan Kicks

A typical year's fuel

United States
$2,722
$1,896 (better)
New Zealand
$1,969 (better)
$2,455
Australia
$2,433
$2,034 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,721
£1,491 (better)

Official figures

Uses
31 mpg
31 mpg (better)
Also
7.7 L/100km
7.6 L/100km (better)
On a full tank
650 miles (better)
336 miles

Space

Seats
7
5
Boot
450 L
–
Towing, braked
3,500 kg
–
Length
4,914 mm
4,295 mm
Weight
2,475 kg
1,170 kg

Engine

Engine
3.0 L V6 turbo diesel
1.6 L 4-cylinder petrol
Power
184 kW (better)
90 kW
Torque
600 Nm (better)
155 Nm
Gearbox
10-speed automatic
CVT
Drive
4WD
FWD

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–
Airbags
9
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Everest or Kicks?

Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Everest or the Nissan Kicks?

The Nissan Kicks: about $830 a year less in the US than the Ford Everest at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Ford Everest or the Nissan Kicks?

The Nissan Kicks, at 7.6 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US) to the Ford Everest's 7.7 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way