Ford Everest vs Isuzu Mu-x
The Everest costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,722 (better)
- $2,747
- New Zealand
- $1,969 (better)
- $1,987
- Australia
- $2,433 (better)
- $2,455
- United Kingdom
- £1,721 (better)
- £1,737
Official figures
- Uses
- 31 mpg (better)
- 30 mpg
- Also
- 7.7 L/100km (better)
- 7.7 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 650 miles (better)
- 644 miles
Space
- Seats
- 7
- 7
- Boot
- 450 L
- –
- Towing, braked
- 3,500 kg
- 3,500 kg
- Length
- 4,914 mm
- 4,850 mm
- Weight
- 2,475 kg
- 2,085 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 3.0 L V6 turbo diesel
- 3.0 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
- Power
- 184 kW (better)
- 140 kW
- Torque
- 600 Nm (better)
- 450 Nm
- Gearbox
- 10-speed automatic
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- 4WD
- 4WD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- 9
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Everest or Mu-x?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Everest or the Isuzu Mu-x?
The Ford Everest: about $20 a year less in the US than the Isuzu Mu-x at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Everest or the Isuzu Mu-x?
The Ford Everest, at 7.7 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US) to the Isuzu Mu-x's 7.7 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 30 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
